What is the W.H.O. up to? (and the toy-maker BRIO?)

Please, friends, read what is below, shared by Steve, of "Watchmen-on-the-Wall" and go to the links to read more, for yourself, so you can decide what should be done about such an atrocity:

Pray!
The Lord is able to deliver His own from evil!
And keep trusting in, learning more of, His Word!
It is Truth!
and it is Life!
Evil men may try to destroy God's heritage (His children).
But His Love is able (easily) to overcome evil men, even turning
their hearts completely around ... to acknowledge His only-begotten
Son, Yeshua (Jesus) the Messiah as Lord & Deliverer / Saviour /
Redeemer of all who will believe in Him, and surrender their lives
to Yeshua (Jesus)!
Praise The Lord for Who He is!
Praise Him using His Names!
He is El Elyon, The Most High God!
He is YHVH Sabaoth, The Lord God of hosts!
He is El Shaddai, our all-Sufficient One!
He is our Good Shepherd, YHVH Raah!
... and He is so much more!

Do not let stories like what is below upset you or cause you to become
anxious, worried or fearful! ... please!
Use it to urge you to get down on your knees, to pray, to plead with
The Lord for more souls to be brought into His Kingdom, by your
efforts (personally), and by the efforts of many others to share The
Gospel message of Life, Light, Truth & the Love of YHVH God!
Praise The Name of The Lord -- Baruch haShem Adonai Elohenu!
Baruch haShem Adonai Yeshua!

The Lord Almighty reigneth!
He is clothed with majesty!
He is able to deliver thee (you)!
Trust in Him!
He dwells in our praises!

And thank Him for what He has done, and will do, to bring Glory
to His Holy Name!

~*~ ~*~ ~*~ ~*~ ~*~ ~*~ ~*~

<http://www.prisonplanet.com/getting-the-kids-ready-for-soft-kill-vaccinatio
ns-"mission-set-immuno".html>

Getting the Kids Ready for Soft Kill
Vaccinations: "Mission Set: Immuno"
Kurt Nimmo
Prison Planet.com
<http://prisonplanet.com/>
Thursday, July 16, 2009

-------------------------------------------

UNICEF, the United Nations Children's Fund, and Swedish toymaker BRIO have
teamed up to get kids ready for their coming soft kill vaccinations.

featured stories Getting the Kids Ready for Soft Kill Vaccinations: Mission
Set: Immuno <http://www.infowars.com/images/brio.jpg>

Mission Set: Immuno, designed to get kids to love their soft kill vaccines.

??!!??

"UNICEF has been developing and selling high quality toys and gifts for over
30 years. The sale of these unique products has contributed towards saving
millions of children's lives across the globe," a BRIO press
<http://www.brio.se/NR/rdonlyres/5BD4C3F4-39CC-4A3B-BB39-9A287A8DC8DE/3320/U
NICEF_Eng.pdf> release states.

The toy is designed to make the globalist UNICEF out to be a rescuing hero:

??!!??

The "Mission Set: Immuno" is a classic BRIO wooden railway set based on a
simple story, which will highlight UNICEF's work in the immunization field.
The product contains 26 play pieces and a story book.

In the story book, Siruv, the nasty virus comes to the village and the
children have to call CEF, the UNICEF hero. CEF immediately comes to the
children's rescue. With the UNICEF emergency vehicle, he brings vaccine for
them and once the children have been immunized, CEF hunts down Siruv and
brings him into custody. Now, the children are safe.

The product is aimed at children aged 3 years+.

??!!??

The mission set has been developed with both children and adults in mind.
Parents can interact with their children by reading the story book to them,
which gives an opportunity for the children to ask questions and to, in a
playful way, become socially aware.

It's too bad kids in the third world - and soon enough, here in the western
world under a possible mandatory flu vaccination regime - are not told the
truth about vaccinations.

For instance, in 2004, a Nigerian pharmaceutical scientist and Dean of
Ahmadu Bello University in Zaria, took samples of the a WHO oral polio
vaccine to India for analysis. Evidence of serious vaccine contamination was
found. Asked why the loving globalist organization would dispense
contaminated vaccines, the scientist, Haruna Kaita, replied: "These
manufacturers or promoters of these harmful things have a secret agenda
which only further research can reveal. Secondly they have always taken us
in the third world for granted, thinking we don't have the capacity,
knowledge and equipment to conduct tests that would reveal such
contaminants. And very unfortunately they also have people to defend their
atrocities within our midst, and worst still some of these are supposed to
be our own professionals who we rely on to protect our interests."

Kaita demanded the manufacturers of the contaminated vaccine "be prosecuted
like any other criminal."

It wasn't the first time people in the third world were tricked into taking
dangerous toxins, cancer viruses, and chemicals designed for sterilization
of women. "Millions of female Mexicans, Nicaraguans and Filipinos were duped
into taking tetanus vaccines, some of which were laced with a female hormone
that could cause miscarriage and sterilization. In 1995 a Catholic
organization called Human Life International accused the WHO of promoting
this Canadian-made tetanus vaccine covertly laced with a pregnancy hormone
called human choriogonadotropic hormone (HCG). Suspicions were aroused when
the tetanus vaccine was prescribed in the peculiar dose of five multiple
injections over a three month period, and recommended only to women of
child-bearing age. When an unusual number of women experienced vaginal
bleeding and miscarriages after the shots, a hormone additive was uncovered
as the cause," writes Alan Cantwell, M.D.
<http://engforum.pravda.ru/archive/index.php/t-205059.html>

??!!??

"At the main hospital in Mbarara during that month of 1977 more than 600
children had died following polio vaccination. 600 children," writes Ugandan
Kihura Nkuba <http://www.naturalnews.com/022400.html> . "So even some of the
timid medical practitioners who were initially afraid to come out, started
coming out giving information and saying 'Oh, we knew this oral polio
vaccine was trouble because as soon as the child receives it, they get a
temperature and their health goes downhill and there is nothing that you
could do.'"

On May 11, 1987, The London Times published "Smallpox vaccine triggered AIDS
virus." The article puts forward evidence linking the smallpox eradication
vaccine program sponsored by the WHO and AIDS in Africa. Almost 100 million
Africans living in central Africa were inoculated by the WHO. The vaccine
was held responsible for awakening a "dormant" AIDS virus infection on the
continent.

??!!??

In 1987, William Campbell Douglass, M.D., told a conference sponsored by the
National Health Federation in Monrovia, California, that WHO was responsible
for murdering countless Africans with the AIDS virus. In his 1989 book,
AIDS: The End of Civilization, Douglass claims the WHO laced the African
vaccines. He blames "the virologists of the world, the sorcerers who brought
us this ghastly plague, and have formed a united front in denying that the
virus was laboratory-made from known, lethal animal viruses." According to
Douglass, the vaccines were designed to attack the human immunological
system.

??!!??

In Emerging Viruses: AIDS and Ebola, Harvard Public Health graduate and
practicing dentist Dr. Leonard Horowitz documents beyond reasonable doubt
that AIDS was manufactured in the laboratories of American universities and
U.S. military biological warfare contractors during the 1960s and 70s
disguised as the Special Virus Cancer Program of The National Institutes of
Health and National Cancer Institute.

Horowitz concludes that HIV was introduced to gay males in the U.S. and
blacks in Africa simultaneously in the late 70s through experimental vaccine
programs, specifically the hepatitis B vaccine developed by Merck, Sharpe,
and Dohm Inc.

But soft kill plagues are not limited to the third world - the west is now
gearing up to vaccinate the public this autumn under the cover of the fake
WHO declared H1N1 "pandemic."

As noted by crack investigative journalist Wayne Madsen
<http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_4631.shtml> and his
sources - in particular a top scientist for the United Nations, who has
examined the outbreak of the deadly Ebola virus in Africa, as well as
HIV/AIDS victims - the H1N1 possesses certain transmission "vectors" that
suggest the new flu strain was genetically-manufactured as a military
biological warfare weapon.
The UN expert believes that Ebola, HIV/AIDS, and
the current A-H1N1 swine flu virus are biological warfare agents.

In the meantime, the New World Order has kicked their propaganda campaign
into overdrive and are targeting children and parents alike with seemingly
harmless toys designed to convince them that toxic vaccines are safe.

Steve
----------------------------------

1 Corinthians 14:8

And also if the trumpet give an uncertain sound, who shall prepare himself
to battle?

"Let not Geneva be forgotten or despised. Religious liberty owes it most
respect." John Adams, the second president of the United States

Before, and many years after the KJV was printed, the GENEVA BIBLE was the
People's Choice, but an ungodly King made it illegal to publish it any
longer: http://www.genevabible.org/Geneva.html Click on "Geneva Bible
History" on my site.

Yahoo Group Owner

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Watchmen-on-the-wall/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Geneva_Bible/
http://groups.google.com/group/Geneva-Bible
Daily Scripture:
<http://www.genevabible.org/ScriptureOfTheDay.html>
http://www.genevabible.org/ScriptureOfTheDay.html

I prefer seeing ladies wearing long skirts / dresses, with lengths near their ankles, full skirts, and petticoat-like half-slips...

Men prefer ladies who wear skirts or dresses. They naturally like to see ladies wearing truly feminine-looking clothing. Most men will admit that they also prefer ladies, whoare not their own wives, or who are "in public," wearing clothing that "covers them," covering their arms at least to the elbows, and covering their knees, and a bit more, as well as not being so tight-fitting that the clothing leaves no question about the lady's "inner form." (underneath)

Whatever happened to ladies dressing modestly? (the dictionary definition of modesty is good enough to define what that word means) Why are women not ashamed to dress in clothing that leaves no element of doubt as to what their "parts" look like, in shape and form, down to the detail!?? What has happened to our understanding that what a woman wears, especially in public, but also at home, can and will defile a man, through his eyes (seeing her, if she is scantily clad)? Do we, especially in the USA, have no fear of God? Do we not realize that we will, one day, answer for and pay the consequences for what we've chosen to do? -- this applies to our thought life, our words, and our actions?

Just as we would teach a child to be "sufficiently covered" ... at least as much as I have described, in words, above, if we are wise, ... we should make sure we are helping our daughters, our growing girls, and more so, our older daughters / young ladies, to cover themselves sufficiently, so as not to entice a man, young or old, to rape, or even to think a wrong thought about these ladies. If we do not teach our daughters, and our granddaughters, to cover their bodies sufficiently, we will reap what we've sown, and we will be held responsible for the results in their lives!

Are we willing to condone under-dressing, any longer, in our society (in the USA)?
Are we willing to "make a statement" that is wise, regarding this topic?
Are we willing to be "seen" as "old-fashioned" or "odd" or "out of touch with the culture," but "wise" in the Eyes of our Lord, Who designed these bodies to be used to give glory to His Name, and not for our own selfish pleasure, or exploitation, due to social pressure (from those who act foolishly, and do not realize what "seeds" they are "sowing")?

I am willing to be criticized. However, if anyone wishes to change my mind about this information I've tried to share here, it is true that I will not be changing my mind about this. A person's personal convictions are given to them by The One Who made the person. Please, if you wish to express your own personal understanding about this topic, you are welcome to email me to express your own opinion or understanding about this topic. If you do not know my email address, then perhaps you do not know me well.

It will do no good to express opposing opinions in response to this blog post, hoping that once you "submit them," they will, then, be immediately "displayed." (they are being moderated) My convictions stand. The Lord does not change. And this teaching has never changed. I did not write it. He did. (However, in this particular blog post, yes, I did write these particular words) I do happen to agree with what He wrote, and I do take what some may call a "very conservative" viewpoint about what The Lord wrote in His Book, The Word of God.

And, yes, what I've shared only expresses my version of what I understand He shared, in His Word, long, long ago, to the best of my ability to "express" what I mean, regarding what dressing modestly means. (I read both the KJV and the Geneva Bible versions) And, yes, I have looked up the meanings of the words used in the Bible in verses that express how women should be clothed. (both Hebrew and Greek, besides doing some cultural studies about modest clothing; God does not change; His standards should remain just as high as they were in Biblical times. This is not "old-fashioned." It is just plain wise to do -- to honor our Maker! He killed an animal to clothe Adam and Eve, when they were "in the transgression." He knows how we should be rightly clothed!)

I can only trust that those who read this post will honor "free speech" by respecting me in sharing my own understanding of what women would be wise to wear. These are, indeed, my expressed opinions / thoughts.

We ladies are not on this earth to attract attention! We are on this earth to work, to serve, to do our duties, love our husbands and our children, and teach our posterity to think and do what is wisest in God's opinion.

If you disagree, I will respect your opinion. I just think it is just (as in "right") to share something I have found to be true -- men do prefer to see women dressing in obviously-feminine clothing, and that means ... in dresses or skirts. And most men will not appreciate seeing a lady who dresses immodestly, ... unless their own lifestyle and behavior, and the company they keep, indicates that they are not wise, honorable, noble, or upright men, themselves.

Below is one website that also offers some thoughts on modesty, for ladies. (and girls)

http://www.lordshandmaid.org/